Why I Accepted The Judgement Of The Election Tribunal As True And Correct Judgment — Robert Clarke
According to Robert Clarke, a prominent lawmaker and advocate in Nigeria, was recently interviewed on the Emerge television web show. The columnist noted Bola Tinubu statement after the Official Political conclusion Appeal Council court validated Bola Tinubu victory in the 2023 official political race.
Photo Credit: Google
According to him, everyone has testified that this issue needs to be resolved before a political decision is made, and the court must be in the proper setting to do so because the High Court has already heard the case and reached a decision.
He claims that since the Discretionary Demonstration, under which the Council is operating, only permits the Court to consider the direct of a political decision and not matters that are not related to the political race, Clarke stated that he agrees with the Council that this is a pre-political decision matter and cannot be handled by this Court.
According to his word: “As I would see it, there is substantially more conversation to be had on this issue at the High Court, and I invite the chance for any party to take it there.
Everybody can see that this is a subject that ought to be settled before the political decision and that the court needs locale to do so on the grounds that the High Court has proactively heard and governed on the issue. Accordingly, I’m hunching down under the watchful eye of the adjudicator”
“The Discretionary Demonstration, under which the Council is working, just allows the Court to examine the direct of a political decision and not matters that are not piece of the political race, and I concur with the Council that this is a pre-political decision matter and can’t be tended to by this Court”
“It’s anything but an issue, yet I need to call attention to that there are two viewpoints to consider. The people who have lost their cases at the lower level could engage the High Court. Whether this is an issue before the political race, I’m demonstrating that I, Robert Clark, acknowledge the judgment as being valid and right. However, what I’m attempting to contend is that our Constitution ensures the right of one or the other party to show up in court assuming they so want. That is the reason I’m saying one more preliminary under an alternate locale is required”
Starting from 4:00
Comments are closed.